Chipmunk 169
  • Alan Murphy
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 36
    Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:30 pm

    Chipmunk 169

    by Alan Murphy » Sat May 07, 2011 10:56 pm

    After two years of research, hard work and considerable investment, Chipmunk '169' has taken to the skies.

    Hats of Declan Curtis for undertaking the project of transforming G-ARGG (ex-RAF WD305) into something truly special. Warbird experts Vintage Fabrics at Audley End were commissioned to carry out the refurbishment and paint work and the result is jaw-dropping, as you can see from these beautiful photographs courtesy of Berry Vissers of Squadron Prints Ltd.

    The aircraft is a faithful replica of Chipmunk 169, as delivered by de Havilland to the Irish Air Corps in 1952.

    Declan Curtis is contactable on declancurtis@talktalk.net if anyone would like to discuss the project.

    Regards,

    Alan
    Attachments
    BerryVissers-21T6515.jpg
    BerryVissers-21T6515.jpg (67.65 KiB) Viewed 7536 times
    BerryVissers-MG0559.jpg
    BerryVissers-MG0559.jpg (34.91 KiB) Viewed 7536 times
    BerryVissers-MG0649.jpg
    BerryVissers-MG0649.jpg (50.24 KiB) Viewed 7536 times
    Last edited by Alan Murphy on Sat May 07, 2011 10:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
  • Alan Murphy
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 36
    Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:30 pm

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by Alan Murphy » Sat May 07, 2011 10:58 pm

    Another photograph...
    Attachments
    BerryVissers-21T6469 copy.jpg
    BerryVissers-21T6469 copy.jpg (62.29 KiB) Viewed 7534 times
  • willo
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 478
    Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 9:33 pm
    Location: EIAB
    Contact:

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by willo » Sun May 08, 2011 7:15 am

    Very nice, know of any plans to visit these shores?
  • Alan Murphy
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 36
    Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:30 pm

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by Alan Murphy » Sun May 08, 2011 10:43 am

    I understand that Irish displays are being discussed, but nothing confirmed at this stage.

    If conditions allow, it is hoped that the aircraft will be permanently based in Ireland.
  • michael747
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:24 pm
    Location: Cambridge Airport

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by michael747 » Sun May 08, 2011 11:52 am

    Nice!!! Where's it based?
    Regards,
    M747
    :D
  • vanman
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 159
    Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:51 pm

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by vanman » Sun May 08, 2011 11:54 am

    Very nice, look forward to seeing it reality. Declan Curtis? Is this the same Declan Curtis, aircraft engineer and pilot for Air Contractors back in the nineties?
  • User avatar
    fireblade900
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 23
    Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 4:26 pm

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by fireblade900 » Sun May 08, 2011 10:09 pm

    great! shes a real beaut!

    Now all we need is another two of em...... 3 in formation, with the irish colours would make it sweet :mrgreen:
  • Comet
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 25
    Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:17 pm
    Location: ROI

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by Comet » Sun May 08, 2011 11:12 pm

    Ye looks nice, but do the wing markings look too big, they seem huge.
  • Alan Murphy
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 36
    Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:30 pm

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by Alan Murphy » Mon May 09, 2011 7:47 am

    michael747 wrote:Nice!!! Where's it based?
    Currently in Scotland, but the aim is to base it here.
    vanman wrote:Very nice, look forward to seeing it reality. Declan Curtis? Is this the same Declan Curtis, aircraft engineer and pilot for Air Contractors back in the nineties?
    The very one.
    fireblade900 wrote:great! shes a real beaut!

    Now all we need is another two of em...... 3 in formation, with the irish colours would make it sweet :mrgreen:
    This could be arranged ... :mrgreen:
    Comet wrote:Ye looks nice, but do the wing markings look too big, they seem huge.
    The roundel colour, sizes and positions are correct.
  • Comet
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 25
    Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:17 pm
    Location: ROI

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by Comet » Mon May 09, 2011 9:29 am

    Thanks, just curious as all photographs that Ive seen had smaller roundel but then it had three colours in it. I remember the Spitfire at Duxford claimed that its colours were correct also but some ex Air Corps guys disagreed.It is hard to get it right.
  • Alan Murphy
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 36
    Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:30 pm

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by Alan Murphy » Mon May 09, 2011 10:53 am

    In 169's case, the paintwork was based on original drawings, old photographs and plenty of consultation with the IAC, de Havilland sources, various historians and so on. I think the consultation process on this was fairly exhaustive. There are two very slight additions that the owner specified in the interest of safety and practicality.

    The Air Corps changed to the new schemes two years (I think) after they took delivery of the Chipmunks, when the Tricolour boss etc was introduced. Most photos I've seen of IAC Chipmunks have the Tricolour boss, orange wingtip and empennage markings, stencilled serial numbers etc — ie, a completely different scheme to the original, as represented here by 169.

    I think most people who undertake warbird projects go to a lot of time, effort and expense to ensure that details are as accurate as possible, but there will always be someone who disagrees (alas, usually without data to back up their assertions) — and that's the nature of the beast, I'm afraid.
  • alphaLaura
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 743
    Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:03 pm
    Contact:

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by alphaLaura » Mon May 09, 2011 12:30 pm

    Great news Alan :D
    The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no.
    I OWN THE SUN
  • stovepipe
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 551
    Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 9:54 am
    Location: Ireland

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by stovepipe » Tue May 10, 2011 12:42 pm

    Hi all,
    Excellent work. Well done to all concerned.With regard to Air Corps paint schemes, there were often inconsistencies between aircraft, even the same type of aircraft. It wasn't unknown for there to be mistakes and deviations from the official paint scheme, especially on details such as stencilled warnings/decals, flag size, positioning, roundel size and positioning and so on.There are probably mistakes on fleet current aircraft. As for the Spitfire, it just looked absolutely beautiful in it's Air Corps scheme and the owner, from what I heard, was quite pissed off with people/wanchors finding fault with his paint scheme (wrong shade, apparently).Now it's in Dutch colours, yet still bears "161" on it's fin.
    So, best of luck to the Chippie operators!;)
    regards
    Stovepipe
  • OnTheNumbers
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 437
    Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:09 pm
    Location: Dublin
    Contact:

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by OnTheNumbers » Tue May 10, 2011 2:57 pm

    Very nice ideed !

    It'll be great to see it in the air and it'll be fantastic if it's based here. Bravo Declan !!

    David
    Last edited by OnTheNumbers on Wed May 11, 2011 4:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
    OnTheNumbers
    -------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.clearofcloud.ie
    @clearofcloud on Twitter, Instagram
  • OnTheNumbers
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 437
    Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:09 pm
    Location: Dublin
    Contact:

    Re: Chipmunk 169

    by OnTheNumbers » Tue May 10, 2011 10:40 pm

    at the risk of thred drift.... anyone know why early IAC roudels were only two colours?

    David
    OnTheNumbers
    -------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.clearofcloud.ie
    @clearofcloud on Twitter, Instagram

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests