Weston VOR
  • mikekilo
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 43
    Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 8:03 pm

    Weston VOR

    by mikekilo » Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:53 pm

    Anybody care to offer an explanation on why Weston has gone to the expense of installing a VOR given the proximity of the Baldonnel VOR?
  • User avatar
    mark
    Site Admin
    Site Admin
    Posts: 1145
    Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 7:56 pm
    Location: Rathfarnham, Dublin
    Contact:

    by mark » Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:20 am

    Hi Mikekilo,

    I reckon it's so VOR DME approaches can be carried out onto runway 07/25.

    Regards,
    Mark
  • Lionel Hutz
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 78
    Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:58 am

    by Lionel Hutz » Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:37 pm

    Indeed Mike Kilo It does indeed appear strange as to why it is needed at all. I am at a loss, unless it is so that they can have straight in approaches, but I fail to see the value in this, because as far as I am aware the minimums for a VOR/DME approach are the same if you go straight in or circle to land.

    Maybee the IAA in their self assumed (but very questionable) infinite wisdom do not allow circle to land.
  • Lionel Hutz
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 78
    Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:58 am

    by Lionel Hutz » Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:44 pm

    Mike Kilo, I spoke too soon, after having a look at the AIP it does appear that there are lower minimums for straight in approaches in Ireland, and on further research I see that this is also the case in the US, just not the case in the one VOR/DME approach that I used to fly a lot.

    Lower minima is probably what's behind it.

    My Initial ignorance just goes to show that if you are not using those IFR skills, the knowledge fades away.

    Ah well it will come back once I start doing it again.
  • User avatar
    hum
    Verified User
    Verified User
    Posts: 596
    Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 1:28 pm
    Location: Co Limerick
    Contact:

    by hum » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:19 pm

    Last edited by hum on Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:59 am, edited 2 times in total.
  • incisor
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 22
    Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:57 pm

    by incisor » Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:24 am

    Bah Humbug! :)
  • Cosmic
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 594
    Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 9:35 pm
    Location: GPS invalid

    by Cosmic » Wed Dec 22, 2004 12:12 pm

    I might have said that the military are also free to switch on and off their VOR anytime they wished. Maybe it was a reliability issue?
  • historical-avi-irl.i8.com
    Unverified User
    Unverified User
    Posts: 261
    Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:06 pm

    by historical-avi-irl.i8.com » Sun Feb 27, 2005 10:43 pm

    On That Subject- Has It Been Turned On Yet- Nov. it wasn't on!, also- when's the new runway(s) being opened.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests