Aerosol Spraying over Dublin
Moderator: mark
-
Alan Dunne
- Unverified User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 1:10 pm
As you said you are not an aviation nerd. So how do you know it wasnt two planes going in opposite directions above and below each other?
Do yoi believe in ghosts too......................
Do yoi believe in ghosts too......................
You pass this way but once, there is no such thing as normal. There is you and the rest, now and forever. Do as you damn well please or you could end up being a pot-bellied, hairless boring old fart.
Alan, quote:
What apart from wiki- explanations for cumulus clouds?..........
Actually nothing to do with Wiki, Because in my opinion the information available on the wiki site could be seriously incorrect, I Mean it could of being edited by someone like YOU
The FACTS that I posted came from having an education and a 95% average over my 14 ATPL exams. The information was a reply to a question asked by Ken.
NAN nu NAN nu!!
Happy hunting, but be careful they might be on to you!
BUT I'M OUT!!!
What apart from wiki- explanations for cumulus clouds?..........
Actually nothing to do with Wiki, Because in my opinion the information available on the wiki site could be seriously incorrect, I Mean it could of being edited by someone like YOU
The FACTS that I posted came from having an education and a 95% average over my 14 ATPL exams. The information was a reply to a question asked by Ken.
NAN nu NAN nu!!
Happy hunting, but be careful they might be on to you!
BUT I'M OUT!!!
-
Alan Dunne
- Unverified User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 1:10 pm
Nope........i don't believe in ghosts..........or extra terrestial UFO's..........
The plane/s where at a low altitude. You could see clearly through the binoculars that the leftover trails where at the same altitude.
Planes that where flying much higher where leaving practically no trail, that dissappeared quickly.
Come now aviation nerds. Let's take our heads out of the sand. I'm not saying planes are evil or nowt. There's no need to be so highly defensive and to descend immediately into ad hominem comments.
The plane/s where at a low altitude. You could see clearly through the binoculars that the leftover trails where at the same altitude.
Planes that where flying much higher where leaving practically no trail, that dissappeared quickly.
Come now aviation nerds. Let's take our heads out of the sand. I'm not saying planes are evil or nowt. There's no need to be so highly defensive and to descend immediately into ad hominem comments.
Last edited by Alan Dunne on Mon May 11, 2009 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Alan Dunne
- Unverified User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 1:10 pm
The FACTS that I posted came from having an education and a 95% average over my 14 ATPL exams.
Woot! you go girl.........
Ok, then cleverclogs.....
What is the mathematical probablity of 8 separate, but perfectly identical planes flying criss-crossed over a piece of sky at the same altitude leaving a trail constructed of 4 more or less equally sized X's over the timeframe of one hour?
-
Alan Dunne
- Unverified User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 1:10 pm
Man, ya gotta love nerds. Their humour is always awful.
So what you're saying is that this is a perfectly normal phenomenon?
That 4 equally sized X's in the sky is perfectly typical. It happens all the time?
I'll be satisified with this answer if that's the case. What makes me doubt this; is the reaction of most of the wally's that frequent this site. They said it was "totally implausible" etc.....
Now it's just "airways"...........
They seemed to think it was so unquestionably non-sensical that they equated it with "ghosts" and "little green men" theories.
However, now it's just "airways".
So what you're saying is that this is a perfectly normal phenomenon?
That 4 equally sized X's in the sky is perfectly typical. It happens all the time?
I'll be satisified with this answer if that's the case. What makes me doubt this; is the reaction of most of the wally's that frequent this site. They said it was "totally implausible" etc.....
Now it's just "airways"...........
They seemed to think it was so unquestionably non-sensical that they equated it with "ghosts" and "little green men" theories.
However, now it's just "airways".
Last edited by Alan Dunne on Mon May 11, 2009 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Folks, this is not funny. It has been scientifically proven that aircraft have been emitting chemicals for years in these "chemtrails/contrails", call them what you will. Samples captured and analysed have been shown to contain high levels of various chemical compounds, and low levels of others which are noxious.
One in particular had the following physical properties: tasteless,colourless and odourless in pure form, but in fact it was found that in sufficient concentration it could cause death rapidly if inhaled. Scientists have isolated the compound and have named it as dihydro-monoxide and have also gone on record as saying that Governments have known about it for years and are ignoring questions from the public about it. You have to ask what they are are afraid of?
http://www.dhmo.org/
edited to add link
One in particular had the following physical properties: tasteless,colourless and odourless in pure form, but in fact it was found that in sufficient concentration it could cause death rapidly if inhaled. Scientists have isolated the compound and have named it as dihydro-monoxide and have also gone on record as saying that Governments have known about it for years and are ignoring questions from the public about it. You have to ask what they are are afraid of?
http://www.dhmo.org/
edited to add link
Last edited by buggyB on Mon May 11, 2009 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Alan Dunne
- Unverified User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 1:10 pm
For those of you who like to read more than aviation periodicals, you may be interested in this rational and lucid article on Geo- Engineering from that bastion publication of conspiracy theories - Time Magazine:
http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/ ... 53,00.html
Here's the weather modification own website:
http://www.weathermodification.org/
Here's another weather modification company founded in 1961:
http://www.weathermod.com/
another interesting article:
http://www.pesn.com/2005/09/06/9600160_ ... ification/
This is what our good friend Wiki has to say on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering
http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/ ... 53,00.html
Here's the weather modification own website:
http://www.weathermodification.org/
Here's another weather modification company founded in 1961:
http://www.weathermod.com/
another interesting article:
http://www.pesn.com/2005/09/06/9600160_ ... ification/
This is what our good friend Wiki has to say on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering
Alan,
Turns out I owe you an apology.
The cause of this has just being reported on CNN.
Turns out that a rich American Business man who owns four 737 800
took on the task of sky writing the Alphabet from New York to London.
They did their first GIANT "A" over NEWYORK on Friday evening and that was then followed by a GIANT "B" 115.84 nautical miles out over the Atlantic. The final GIANT"Z" (115.84x26) ended up over London Saturday evening with a GIANT "Y" over Wales. And what you seen was obviously the GIANT "X"
Well that sorts that then!
Turns out I owe you an apology.
The cause of this has just being reported on CNN.
Turns out that a rich American Business man who owns four 737 800
took on the task of sky writing the Alphabet from New York to London.
They did their first GIANT "A" over NEWYORK on Friday evening and that was then followed by a GIANT "B" 115.84 nautical miles out over the Atlantic. The final GIANT"Z" (115.84x26) ended up over London Saturday evening with a GIANT "Y" over Wales. And what you seen was obviously the GIANT "X"
Well that sorts that then!
-
Alan Dunne
- Unverified User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 1:10 pm
The X's or criss-crosses in the sky over Dublin yesterday where much clearer and distinct than appears in that video.
His discription of a "checker-board" was apt for yesterday.
Ken did you get any photo's of X's above the sky near Blackrock yesterday morning (which where still there 'til after lunch?......Neither me nor any of the 8 people I was with thought of taking a photograph to confirm our mass hallucination
His discription of a "checker-board" was apt for yesterday.
Ken did you get any photo's of X's above the sky near Blackrock yesterday morning (which where still there 'til after lunch?......Neither me nor any of the 8 people I was with thought of taking a photograph to confirm our mass hallucination